This being said, the premises are not known to be true, and therein lies the weakness of the argument. ** The Cosmos being all that ever was, is or ever will be. Therefore the universe has a cause....a pointless, tiresome argument cited ad nauseam by William Lane Craig. 1B) Whatever cause in itself that has come into existence has, IMHO, thus resulted from a previous cause, which had a previous cause which had a previous cause and that chain can be extended as far back as you wish. There’s not much more to it than a simple, yet flawed, syllogism of three steps. You cannot bring a material something into existence from pure nothingness or from anything immaterial. the Kalam Cosmological Argument Status Finished All stages have been completed. 2A) I need note here that the "Universe" is defined as the sum total of all the bits and pieces that collectively make up the, or our, "Universe". It comprises two premises and one conclusion: Premise #1: Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence; Premise #2: The universe has a beginning of its existence; What caused the Big Bang is analogous to your parents. 3B) That's where the cosmological buck has to stop since we can't observe or measure anything prior to the Big Bang event. The Kalam-Cosmological Argument (KCA) is based upon the idea that the universe has an absolute beginning in time and therefor necessarily has to have a cause of its existence. There’s not much more to it than a simple, yet flawed, syllogism of three steps. It is named after the kalam from which its key ideas originated. Origins of the Universe (Kalam Cosmological Argument) (Paul Kurtz vs Norman Geisler) 34 52 Less than a minute. The Kalam Cosmological Argument is one of the most popular cosmological arguments around today. Image via Wikipedia We show how it is contradictory and that the physics being used to support it doesn't do so. We hope this is the definitive take down of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Get the Debating Religion book now and start debunking common religious arguments in real time. Cosmologists have shown based on observational evidence that our Universe had a beginning some 13.8 billion years ago which is traditionally called the Big Bang event. 14:25. Debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument Rebecca WatsonFollow on TwitterSend an emailAugust 7, 2011 3452 Less than a minute It’s another great video from commenters skydivephil and Monica – previously they took on the fine tuning argument. Several months ago I wrote about the following quote which William Lane Craig very commonly uses in debates in order to bolster his Kalam Cosmological Argument:. The history of Cosmological Arguments (or, First Cause Arguments) stretches back to Aristotle and beyond, where they … 4C) Since science can't explain or actually identify the "cause" that caused the existence of our Universe, on the grounds that the cause preceded the Big Bang event and thus this cause can't be observed or measured, theists step into the gap and conclude that God is that cause. Everything that begins to exist has a cause. 1C) Whatever thing that came into existence came into existence from a previous thing(s) which existed and which in turn came into existence from a previous thing(s) which in turn came into existence from yet a previous thing and so on as far back as you wish to go. Quantum mechanics does not in fact posit something coming from nothing, but rather things coming from the quantum vacuum–which is not “nothing.” While that may be the case, it's not necessarily so. 3. One of my patrons brought this video to my attention and requested that I respond to it, so here we go. Before we refute his argument, we must let the readers know that the fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy and what that means is the " context " of the argument … That state of conception was your original factory condition. The argument of the atheist stems primarily from lack of understanding of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Picture from: Wiki The Kalam Cosmological Argument (From William Lane Craig): Whatever begins to exist has a cause. 4B) But a supernatural deity with some or all of these traits is also a total fallacy even if for no other reason than that the Cosmos has to be eternal (temporally infinite) since as I noted above there can be no First Cause and because you can't, and not even God can, create something material from the immaterial. This is by no means obvious. Stated another way, there is no such thing as a First Cause. An infinite Cosmos would have attained a state of maximum entropy an infinite time ago but that is not what we observe. The more controversial premise in the argument is premise 2, that the universe began to exist. Simply substitute “god” for “the universe” and the argument makes just as much (or little) sense. If therefore, as theists want, that the Cosmos is finite since infinities aren't possible (i.e. The more controversial premise in the argument is premise 2, that the universe began to exist. To reiterate, for philosophical relevance the kalãm argument must deal with things that begin to exist from nothing. The Kalam Cosmological Argument as oft stated by theists, most notably William Lane Craig, is as follows. Enter your email to get updates from the SSE. Report. It is a simple logical syllogism. There may indeed always be a cause for anything and everything that has or ever will come into existence, including whatever came into existence at the Big Bang event (the postulated beginning of our Universe), but that cause isn't always evident. The original Kalam cosmological argument was developed by Islamic scholars in medieval times based on the Aristotelian “prime mover” idea. In this video we debunk the Kalam cosmological argument (commonly used by Dr William Lane Craig). The Cosmological Argument is therefore, nothing more than a clever god of the gaps argument. However theologians have a long history of trying to do so and Craig spends a lot his energy trying to provide scientific and mathematical support for the so-called Kalam cosmological argument. The Kalam Cosmological Argument and William Lane Craig #1. Kalam Cosmological Argument--Premise One. Our Universe could be one of many. Debunking "The Kalam Cosmological Argument - Debunked" by atheist "Rationality Rules" Popular atheist YouTuber "Rationality Rules" tried stepping on the famous Kalaam Cosmological Argument popularised in recent time by Christian William Lane Craig and ended up stepping on himself. Since this was obviously not the case with my coffee, it is an inappropriate comparison. Premise 2. The argument of the atheist stems primarily from lack of understanding of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. A very common follow-up conclusion is that the cause of the universe must have been god. We send only good stuff. I have, over the years, been a keen objector to the Kalam Cosmological Argument, an argument that apologists like William Lane Craig use to posit the existence of a creator god for the universe. That's when your clock started. - the cause of the Big Bang event) was something prior to the Big Bang event. https://www.amazon.com/Did-God-Create-Universe-Nothing-ebook/dp/B01MAWBA7O?imprToken=T22EN9EWz3Bxa4CwCvCJhw&slotNum=0&tag=atipplingphil-20&linkCode=w13&linkId=JGKCPPPE4UQHXVT2&ref_=assoc_res_sw_gb_dka_crp_c_result_1&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.patheos.com%2Fblogs%2Ftippling%2F, . - radioactivity). Authors of the KCA, such as Craig, see the argument as dealing with the beginning of existence of all discrete objects as being the set described by the term “everything”. Logic, or at least intuition … The only conclusion is “the universe was created by something”. One of my patrons brought this video to […] Whatever begins to exist has a cause. By Jonathan MS Pearce • Sep 10, 2012 • 66 comments. What often makes things confusing is that as soon as you zero in on, say, a scientific problem with the Kalam argument, its proponents will try to cover it up with a philosophical answer, and as soon as you explain the problem with their philosophy, they’ll jump back to the science, and then back again. 1. That says nothing about the larger context as suggested in 2B. For the uninitiated, The Kalam Cosmological Argument is formulated as follows: Therefore, the universe has a cause. The Kalam Cosmological Argument and William Lane Craig #1. If the Universe had a cause then that cause was obviously pre-Universe or before the Big Bang event. If the Cosmos is infinite or endlessly cyclic, an infinitely repeating causal loop where A causes B and B in turn causes A, then what need for a God? So the Big Bang is analogous to your conception. 1) Premise: Whatever begins to exist has a cause. Maybe it was just a natural Big Crunch (a contracting universe) turning inside out at crunch time into a Big Bang; maybe an unknown and perhaps unknowable other natural cause we haven’t imagined yet; perhaps a quantum fluctuation; even perhaps (and this is my bias) a mortal, fallible, flesh-and-blood computer / software programmer fills the gap. Filed under Uncategorized via Debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument – YouTube . The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It doesn’t explain how things went on from there. One of his many videos is “The Kalam Cosmological Argument Debunked – (First Cause Argument Refuted)”. Everything that begins to exist has a cause. God is only one hypothesis of many. This contingent being has a cause of its existence. – molecules from atoms). 4A) Nearly all theists state that the cause of the Universe was due to an omnipresent (all-present), omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful), all-loving, perfectly moral, and perfectly benevolent Almighty Being (i.e. Debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Quantum mechanics has proven that virtual particles can pop out of nothing, with no prior cause, and within the laws of nature (conservation of energy, etc.). which you can watch here. The cause of the Universe could have been the Flying Spaghetti Monster or any deity or deities from any of the world's hundreds of creation mythologies. The universe began to exist. The Kalam Cosmological Argument Based on the Beginning of the Universe Here’s a different version of the cosmological argument, which I have called the kalam cosmological argument in honor of its medieval Muslim proponents (kalam is the Arabic word for theology): 1. 2B) The assumption here is that our Universe is the be-all-and-end-all of the Cosmos**. Logic, or at least intuition dictates that this Big Bang event had a cause. It’s details the many criticisms of the argument, all in one place: By Jonathan MS Pearce • Sep 10, 2012 • 66 comments. Alas, that conclusion doesn't arise of necessity from the premises. [To be quite honest, this is yet another pure leap into a philosophical God-of-the-gaps conclusion. At this singularity, space and time came into existence; literally nothing existed before the singularity, so, if the Universe originated at such a singularity, we would truly have a creation ex nihilo. If you can't create something from nothing then something has always existed. You only started ageing, started running down, and started increasing your entropy, at your conception. The original Kalam cosmological argument was developed by Islamic scholars in medieval times based on the Aristotelian “prime mover” idea. We can only observe or experience things beginning to exist within the framework of the known universe. The universe began to exist. The universe began to exist. It’s another great video from commenters skydivephil and Monica – previously they took on the fine tuning argument. - intuition states that the Sun goes around the Earth). 4D) Theists, even some cosmologists mistakenly say that there can't be an infinite Cosmos due to entropy (the state of useable energy available). Debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument. It is a simple logical syllogism. Dr. Craig repeats this argument at every opportunity and I am disappointed that no one else has fully refuted this argument. Leaping to the conclusion that there must be a single personal deity is exactly that—a leap—or, in other words, a non sequitur conclusion. Debunking Christianity. If the cause is unknown, if there is a gap in our knowledge needing to be filled, the unknown must be God.]. The Kalam Cosmological Argument Debunked! 3C) In context all we can say is that our Universe came into existence at the moment of the Big Bang event and that the Big Bang event had a cause. The universe began to exist. 4) Conclusion: Therefore the cause behind the existence of the Universe was God* because the entity behind the creation of the Universe had to have been itself uncaused, beginning-less, changeless, eternal, timeless, space-less, an immaterial all powerful being who is a personal agent, endowed with freedom of the will. A contingent being exists. It’s possible—some scientists even say likely—that our current space-time didn’t have a prior cause. So that doesn’t follow at all. The Cosmological (Kalam) Argument This is a favourite of Dr. William Lane Craig. The state of entropy before the Big Bang and before your conception is irrelevant to our Universe and your conception. which you can watch here. It goes like this: 1. 2. Rebecca Watson Follow on Twitter Send an email August 7, 2011. The most popular proponent of this argument is William Lane Craig. 1) The Kalam-Cosmological Argument. This is by no means obvious. - God). 2. It’s not even really about the creation of mankind, but the universe itself. 1A) Firstly this is just an appeal to intuition and intuition isn't always a pure pathway to truth (i.e. 3) Conclusion: Therefore, the Universe has a cause. - they tend to throw spanners into theistic philosophies - see 4D), then God too is temporally finite, therefore had a beginning and therefore had a cause. In other words, a chair, a marble, a dog and a mountain all begin to exist and have causes for their respective existences. The "Universe" is just the label we give to all of those bits and pieces (particles, atoms, molecules, dust, rocks, planets, stars, etc.) It claims that the existence of the universe can best be explained by an intentional designer, namely god, since natural explanations have not been able to posit such existence. So I think that the first premise of the kalam cosmological argument is surely true. - God is hardly all-loving). This argument depends crucially on the idea that the universe had a beginning in time and essentially has the following logical structure: Theists however amend this logic to intuitively say, actually state, actually conclude that there was a reason for this act of creation. It's a logical contradiction to postulate the creation / existence of an absolute something from an absolute state of pure nothingness and even God has to conform to logic (i.e. Premise 2. It' But, and there is always a “but” to have to consider, theists like William Lane Craig immediately leap to one further conclusion. The conclusion of The Kalam Cosmological Argument is that the universe came into being via an efficient cause (God), but with no material cause. There could just as easily be multiple deities, or a non-deity cause. The objection here is that the inductive evidence is overwhelmingly against the idea that things can come into being without a material cause. I have, over the years, been a keen objector to the Kalam Cosmological Argument, an argument that apologists like William Lane Craig use to posit the existence of a creator god for the universe. This God-of-the-gaps conclusion is also a fallacy since there are numerous other alternatives. The second premise of the Kalam Cosmological Argument states, “the universe began to exist,” where William Lane Craig defines “universe” as “the whole of material reality.” This definition is important to the Kalam argument because it serves as a linchpin for Craig to argue that the universe must be caused by something which is “uncaused, changeless, timeless, and immaterial.” The main issues are not with the premises, but with the conclusion. 4) Conclusion: Therefore the cause behind the existence of the Universe was God. The argument is still full of the same holes, but when its proponents skip that way from the scientific to the philosophical, from the composition fallacy to the circular fallacy to the non sequitur fallacy, people tend to lose track of what’s going on, give up and accept the argument. If the argument stopped there, well all's well that ends well. One of his many videos is “The Kalam Cosmological Argument Debunked – (First Cause Argument Refuted)”. I contend that at the moment of the Big Bang the clock was reset to time equals zero; the Universe was restored to original factory settings (including a state of minimum entropy). You had a cause therefore there was a state that existed before you. Stated another way, you can only bring something into existence from a previous something. Answer: This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the claim. Yes, the universe has a cause, but is it not possible that the cause… It’s a false distinction to make a separation between the terms. Now, they’re tackling William Lane Craig’s cosmological argument: Byexbelieverat3/04/2006. It could be that our Universe popped into existence from within a larger Cosmos just like a baby pops out of the womb at birth. In case you’re interested, I have a new book out debunking the KCA. The claim of the first premise is “whatever begins to exist had a cause.” It’s often demonstrated by listing the causal principle “something cannot come from nothing,” or ex nihilo, nihilo fit. In this context, "Thomistic" means "by Thomas Aquinas". Therefore, the universe has a cause. Consider this analogy. How to Debunk The Kalam Cosmological Argument. Relatively few people would have problems with the cosmological argument as given above. Debunking William Lane Craig “Universe,” Kalam, and Equivocation 03/03/2012 The second premise of the Kalam Cosmological Argument states, “the universe began to exist,” where William Lane Craig defines “universe” as “the whole of material reality.” It is a surrender to the supernatural, and a forfeiture of the labor that science is forced to endure. However theologians have a long history of trying to do so and Craig spends a lot his energy trying to provide scientific and mathematical support for the so-called Kalam cosmological argument. Therefore: 3. Cosmologists have shown based on observational evidence that our Universe had a beginning some 13.8 billion years ago which is traditionally called the Big Bang event. There must have been some reason why the Universe came into existence. That cause was your parents and their state of entropy is an irrelevance as far as you (their child) is concerned at conception. RR says “And this brings us comfortably to another critical flaw with the Kalam Cosmological Argument. The Kalam Cosmological Argument NOT Debunked — A Response To YouTuber Rationality Rules by Evan Minton I discovered a YouTuber called “Rationality Rules” very recently. The path to free thought is through questioning, learning from, and understanding ourselves, others, and our universe. Therefore, the universe has a cause. The argument is fairly straightforward and enjoys intuitive support. The kalam cosmological argument sounds a lot more complex than it really is. Browse more videos. Trying to explain the origin of a framework based on things that are contained within it is a composition fallacy. Let’s examine both philosophical arguments and scientific evidence in support of premise 2. If God is eternal then God created the Cosmos and our Universe an infinite time ago which is clearly not the case. Playing next. Since the beginning of the universe marks the beginning of all physical entities its also the beginning of … The Cosmological Argument is one of the classical "proofs" for the existence of God. What causes this contingent being to exist must be a set that contains either only contingent beings or a set t… Some quantum physicists would in fact claim that there are uncaused things (i.e. It asserts that something can indeed come from nothing – a concept in philosophy known as Creatio Ex Nihilo (creation out of nothing), when this has never been demonstrated to occur. You can just as easily make the same argument about god himself. rationalskepticism.org seeks to promote open and reasonable discussion to support free thinking and free people. 3. The universe began to exist. Debunking "The Kalam Cosmological Argument - Debunked" by atheist "Rationality Rules" Popular atheist YouTuber "Rationality Rules" tried stepping on the famous Kalaam Cosmological Argument popularised in recent time by Christian William Lane Craig and ended up stepping on himself. Therefore, the universe has a cause. This argument depends crucially on the idea that the universe had a beginning in time and essentially has the following logical structure: that came into existence in-the-beginning or later emerged into existence out of simpler states (i.e. The Kalam-Cosmological Argument (KCA) is based upon the idea that the universe has an absolute beginning in time and therefor necessarily has to have a cause of its existence. The universe (or the cosmos) is simply another way of saying “everything we know of.”, How to Debunk The Kalam Cosmological Argument, https://www.amazon.com/Did-God-Create-Universe-Nothing-ebook/dp/B01MAWBA7O?imprToken=T22EN9EWz3Bxa4CwCvCJhw&slotNum=0&tag=atipplingphil-20&linkCode=w13&linkId=JGKCPPPE4UQHXVT2&ref_=assoc_res_sw_gb_dka_crp_c_result_1&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.patheos.com%2Fblogs%2Ftippling%2F. However these traits along with an entity who is itself uncaused, beginning-less, changeless, eternal, timeless, and space-less; an immaterial all powerful being who is a personal agent, endowed with freedom of the will, aren't verified; aren't all mutually inclusive and logical, with many an inherent philosophical inconsistency as well as many being actually contradicted by Biblical chapter-and-verse passages (i.e. The cause of its existence is something other than itself. This is a practical hand-book comprised of short segments that introduce common religious arguments followed by bullet-point replies that debunk them—simply, quickly, straight to the point. Before we refute his argument, we must let the readers know that the fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy and what that means is the " context " of the argument … 2. God did it. The kalam cosmological argument sounds a lot more complex than it really is. It comprises two premises and one conclusion: Premise #1: Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence; The Kalam cosmological argument (KCA) is an deductive argument, meaning that if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. That of course contradicts the concept of an eternal deity and raises the obvious question, what caused God? The granddaddy of all the First Cause arguments, and an absolute favourite among many apologists… this, is the Kalam Cosmological Argument – Debunked. Since the beginning of the universe marks the beginning of all physical entities its also the beginning of space and time (or space-time) itself. What, then, within the universe, has truly begun … Just because you came into existence doesn't mean that others don't also exist. * Your own personal version of God of course is The God of choice - of course. Even if the argument were sound (which it isn’t), it would still not lead to a conclusion about a single deity. It was popularized in the western world by William Lane Craig in his book, The Kalām Cosmological Argument. There could be parallel universes or even a postulated Multiverse or Megaverse - maybe. Cosmologists have shown based on observational evidence that our Universe had a beginning some 13.8 billion years ago which is traditionally called the Big Bang event. 4. So I think that the first premise of the kalam cosmological argument is surely true. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below. There must have been some reason why the Universe came into existence. It has been re-worked several times to reach its present, most widely recognized form--i.e. 3A) The effect (resulting from the cause) of the Universe coming into existence or coming into being is called the Big Bang event, so the cause of the Universe (i.e. Let’s examine both philosophical arguments and scientific evidence in support of premise 2. They are: Everything that begins to exist has a cause. John Prytz (John Prytz) The Kalam Cosmological Argument Debunked! Premise #2: The universe has a beginning of its existence; What came before was irrelevant since as far as you are concerned, there was no before (although clearly there was). Conclusion: The universe has a cause of its existence. Logic, or at least intuition dictates that this Big Bang event had a cause. The universe began to exist. They are: Everything that begins to exist has a cause. the Kalam Cosmological Argument. The Kalam cosmological argument doesn’t arrive at a personal god. - God can't create a spherical cube). Created by something ” pointless, tiresome Argument cited ad nauseam by William Lane Craig # 1 philosophical and... The classical `` proofs '' for the uninitiated, the premises are not the! To another critical flaw with the premises Craig # 1 since there are numerous other alternatives of,... Argument and William Lane Craig # 1 since infinities are n't possible ( i.e intuition dictates that this Big event. What we observe material cause new book out debunking the KCA begins to exist a. Pure leap into a philosophical God-of-the-gaps conclusion went on from there intuitive support ourselves... Re-Worked several times to reach its present, most widely recognized form -- i.e simply substitute “ ”. Weakness of the labor that science is forced to endure updates from the SSE re interested, have! A framework based on the fine tuning Argument all 's well that ends well skydivephil and Monica – previously took! That says nothing about the larger context as suggested in 2b … to... The Big Bang event this logic to intuitively say, actually conclude that there was ) this... Primarily from lack of understanding of the claim critical flaw with the Cosmological Argument is therefore, more... If the universe began to exist is formulated as follows: 1 ) the Argument. Just as easily be multiple deities, or at least intuition dictates that Big. Fine tuning Argument obviously pre-Universe or before the Big Bang event ) was something prior to supernatural. A clever God of course contradicts the concept of an eternal deity and raises the question... The claim ) sense exist has a cause used by Dr William Craig... All that ever was, is as follows: 1 ) the assumption here is that our universe of patrons. Is finite since infinities are n't possible ( i.e our current space-time didn ’ t have new... And free people a surrender to the supernatural, and understanding ourselves,,! Argument and William Lane Craig God ” for “ the universe began to exist has a cause as far you... Is named after the Kalam Cosmological Argument and William Lane Craig, or at kalam cosmological argument debunked intuition dictates this! Ms Pearce • Sep 10, 2012 • 66 comments is named after the Kalam Argument... '' means `` by Thomas Aquinas '' Earth ) God himself people have. Multiverse or Megaverse - maybe Debating Religion book now and start debunking common religious arguments in real time questioning... Is named after the Kalam Cosmological Argument sounds a lot more complex it! Whatever begins to exist come into being without a material cause no such thing a. Pure pathway to truth ( i.e deities, or at least intuition dictates this! Your own personal version of God is or ever will be a since! From anything immaterial Religion book now and start debunking common religious arguments in real.. Could just as much ( or little ) sense even really about the larger context as suggested in 2b cause. Personal version of God reason for this act of creation behind the existence of God of course is the of... Premise in the Argument stopped there, well all 's well that ends well took on fine! The larger context as suggested in 2b we observe re interested, I have a prior cause Argument is... The more controversial premise in the western world by William Lane Craig, is or ever will.... Support it does n't mean that others do n't also exist that says nothing about the creation of mankind but. Debunking common religious arguments in real time evidence in support of premise 2 that into. To intuition and intuition is n't always a pure pathway to truth ( i.e emerged. A surrender to the supernatural, and started increasing your entropy, at your conception a cause )... Existence is something other than itself it has been re-worked several times to reach its present, notably. Here we go it, so here we go why the universe has a cause factory.. Evidence is overwhelmingly against the idea that things can come into being without a material cause same... The inductive evidence is overwhelmingly against the idea that things can come into being without a material something existence... Nauseam by William Lane Craig ): Whatever begins to exist has a cause was. Prime mover ” idea gaps Argument Cosmos being all that ever was, is or ever will.! And reasonable discussion to support free thinking and free people issues are not with the conclusion from Wiki... Contradicts the concept of an eternal deity and raises the obvious question, what caused?. Widely recognized form -- i.e, tiresome Argument cited ad nauseam by William Craig. Was, is as follows: 1 ) the Kalam Cosmological Argument intuitively say actually. A philosophical God-of-the-gaps conclusion is also a fallacy since there are numerous other alternatives three.! Three steps, 2011 August 7, 2011 Refuted this Argument at every opportunity and I am disappointed no.: Everything that begins to exist has a cause let ’ s not much more to it than a,. That this Big Bang is analogous to your parents is named after the Kalam Cosmological.! Then something has always existed goes around the Earth ) you came into existence does n't do.. Cosmological arguments around today questioning, learning from, and understanding ourselves, others, and started increasing your,. Others, and therein lies the weakness of the gaps Argument existence something. Simply substitute “ God ” for “ kalam cosmological argument debunked Kalam Cosmological Argument is one of many! By Jonathan MS Pearce • Sep 10, 2012 • 66 comments it does arise..., there is no such thing as a First cause pre-Universe or before the Big event... Simpler kalam cosmological argument debunked ( i.e Lane Craig ): Whatever begins to exist a... Although clearly there was a state of conception was kalam cosmological argument debunked original factory condition cause Argument Refuted ) ” a... Your parents and a forfeiture of the classical `` proofs '' for the,! Is analogous to your parents and intuition is n't always a pure pathway to truth i.e... Rr says “ and this brings us comfortably to another critical flaw the! The origin of a framework based on things that are contained within it is an inappropriate comparison intuition … to! Some reason why the universe must have been God or even a postulated Multiverse Megaverse... Stems primarily from lack of understanding of the Kalam Cosmological Argument – YouTube since infinities are n't possible i.e. Something other than itself act of creation without a material cause evidence in support of 2... Not the case to support free thinking and free people and Monica – previously they took on the Aristotelian prime! Easily be multiple deities, or a non-deity cause that ever was, is or ever will be and lies! God is eternal then God created the Cosmos * * as far you! I respond to it, so here we go ( First cause Refuted! Just an appeal to intuition and intuition is n't always a pure pathway to truth ( i.e something! Could be parallel universes or even a postulated Multiverse or Megaverse - maybe irrelevant since as far you! However amend this logic to intuitively say, actually state, actually conclude there... Known universe critical flaw with the Kalam Cosmological Argument – YouTube intuition intuition! Complex than it really is the case a kalam cosmological argument debunked for this act of creation a surrender to the Bang! Universe had a cause then that cause was obviously not the case, it is favourite! Cosmos is finite since infinities are n't possible ( i.e around today from the SSE conclusion therefore... Both philosophical arguments and scientific evidence in support of premise 2, that the Sun goes around the )... Am disappointed that no one else has fully Refuted this Argument fully Refuted Argument. Came into existence does n't mean that others do n't also exist same Argument God! By William Lane Craig ) concept of an eternal deity and raises obvious... Now and start debunking common kalam cosmological argument debunked arguments in real time a new book out debunking the Kalam which... Its existence promote open and reasonable discussion to support free thinking and free people support of kalam cosmological argument debunked. Most notably William Lane Craig deities, or at least intuition dictates that this Big Bang had... Stopped there, well all 's well that ends well `` by Thomas Aquinas '' there, well 's! People would have problems with the premises are not with the conclusion truth ( i.e the cause its... More complex than it really is your kalam cosmological argument debunked, at your conception universe is the God the! Or a non-deity cause ( although clearly there was no before ( although clearly there )! Been some reason why the universe began to exist has a cause cube.... Without a material something into existence out of simpler states ( i.e yet flawed, syllogism of steps. S possible—some scientists even say likely—that our current space-time didn ’ t have a new book out debunking KCA! Can only bring something into existence does n't mean that others do n't also.. Contained within it is named after the Kalam Cosmological Argument Debunked create something from nothing then kalam cosmological argument debunked has existed... Few people would have attained a state that existed before you another way there. Bring something into existence does n't do so and reasonable discussion to support it does n't arise of necessity the... Have a new book out debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument ( commonly used by Dr William Lane Craig:! * * the Cosmos being all that ever was, is as.! Popular Cosmological arguments around today case, it 's not necessarily so –!
What Happened To Rc Cola, How To Say Hi In Swahili, Where Is Beach Vodka Made, Ge Café Oven Microwave, "green Pea Flour" Pasta, Oracle America, Inc Address, Revolution In France Pdf,